SLPOA AND DSAA'S FAILURE TO SIGN SIERRA GLOBAL WARMING PLEDGE
Maybe we should send an 'open letter' to them and request their reasoning. It's pretty frustrating, as they put themselves forward as representing Donner Summit, but not signing seems a little head in the sandish, no? And maybe not terrifically representative of consensus on Donner Summit?
Look at what SLPOA and DSAA signed onto in the group of 8's recent "vision" :
8. Maintain and improve regional air quality and limit greenhouse gas emissions.
Control of greenhouse gasses involves minimizing traffic and using alternative sources
of energy.If greenhouse gasses are not controlled, virtually every climate model shows
there will be no snowpack in the northern Sierra by the mid twenty-first century.
You think they're addressing global warming, but actually they're sidestepping admitting global warming exists, with this watered-down reference to green house gas--maybe they got bogged down in the "angels dancing on the head of the pin" argument about whether it's man-made or not? The thing is, while "minimizing traffic and using alternative sources of energy" is a good start, it's a drop in the bucket--the pledge went much further than this--and unless things like sprawl, and new development prevented where there are not resources to support it, and carbon sequestration, etc. aren't addressed...
The way I see it, with SLPOA, and DSAA also, there's very little transparency, and very little solicitation of public input. The survey DSAA conducted a year ago or so was very clear about how the majority of us felt, but, sometimes, particularly in regards to how DSAA remains neutral towards Royal Gorge development, it seems the survey results are an "inconvenient truth"
It's one thing for SLPOA and DSAA to be "big fishes" in the small pond of Donner Summit, and sign on with 6 other groups on their "vision"--but it's certainly disturbing they're not willing to join
53 other groups to stand in solidarity, and work together to address what is a
Sierra Wide problem.
It's worth reading the YubaNet article about the pledge, and going to Sierra Nevada Alliance's site for more information. Here's an excerpt from the YubaNet piece:
"The commitment of these organizations demonstrates that leadership and innovative solutions will be coming from rural areas like the Sierra, and not just from Sacramento or Washington D.C.," stated Marion Gee, Water and Climate Program Associate at the Sierra Nevada Alliance. "Our Sierra communities can be safer, have reliable water, diverse wildlife and robust economies if we plan ahead. Their commitment is a model for the nation."
I'd like to think SLPOA and DSAA were on board with this commitment.