FROM SAVE THE SUMMIT'S ARCHIVES

General comments about the proposed development.

FROM SAVE THE SUMMIT'S ARCHIVES

New postby Kathryn Gray » Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:18 pm

Since SLPOA lost all of the archives on its forum, I looked back through my savethesummit archives for any apropos items I'd written in the past--I thought this one was worth a repeat. It applies to quite a few developers, and certainly I think it can describe Kirk Syme of Woodstock Development and Todd Foster and Mark Foster of Foster Enterprises Royal Gorge LLC modus operandi.

PAVE EVERY MOUNTAIN
A developer's pocket guide to quelling opposition, and reaching new heights in profits

Buy the properties under various fictitious names- that will make it harder for nosy community groups to keep track of what you own, and what you're doing to it. It's not their business anyway.
Think "green", or at least think how to talk "green", even if in your heart of hearts you know that bulldozing hillsides, clear-cutting trees, dredging and damming lakes, and dewatering class one trout streams is, well, maybe not exactly any color remotely near green. Maybe it's not even a color at all, but more of a word picture- like "scorched earth." Oh- and all the wood and cement and resources you'll use building 4 story condos- they don't exactly grow on trees, do they? Well, the wood does- maybe you can "recycle" all those trees you've clear-cut into building lumber. That'll enhance your "green" credentials. Right.
Be warm, fuzzy, cosy, and dishonest as all get out to the public. Convince them that you are the "People's Developer", the one granting unlimited access to places, like Forest Service lands, that they've had access to all along. Meanwhile, let your investors know you really intend to cover the area with tony, private lodges, that no way will you let the shabby locals into- unless they work there, of course.
Try to convince the locals that you're the "good" developer, and warn them that if they're fractious and prevent you from covering the mountain with 1000 condos, the "bad" developer who comes after you will cover the mountain with 1000 condos.
Spend whatever astronomical amount you can get banks to loan you, and then, when you've blown it all on consultants and lawyers, demand your "reasonable investment expectations". Hope the public doesn't notice you (and the banks) have engaged in gambling, and they're expected to cover your losses.
Make friends with the politicians, the supervisors, county employees, and their mothers. Buy whatever their children are selling, be it cookies, wreaths, or wrapping paper, and, you might consider donating to the elected officials' campaign funds. Donate lots. And then do it again. As for influencing the unelected officials, well, consider hiring a lobbyist- they'll have a hint or two for you.
Mountains have lots of steep places that even you can't build on. Call this "open space" and encourage public groups to raise money to buy it from you. (Hint: if it's really, really steep, and maybe prone to avalanches, and the groups won't cough up the money, then give it to the county as "mitigation" for all the other bad things you're planning for the mountain.)
Convince the locals you're going to build "the happiest place on earth", with camp vernacular, Sierra appropriate, never taller than the shortest trees architecture. Of course, those 3 and 4 story condos are pretty high, so maybe you should invest in some very tall, flame retardant artificial trees- the kinds phone companies pay you to install. Even if your development looms above the natural trees, at least everyone will have good cell phone reception- and you'll receive some cell phone generated income.

Oh, about that "happiest place on earth"- if the locals are pretty happy with the way it is now, and rather grumpy about your proposed condo empire, you might want to think of a way to, if not maximize your profits, at least get off the mountain in one piece (financially speaking, of course). Start talking to friendly land trusts now.

Kathryn Gray, first published March 30, 2008 (it seems that "scorched earth" theme has a constant resonance, doesn't it?)
Kathryn Gray
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:04 am

DO DEVELOPERS DREAM OF ELECTRIC WOLVERINES

New postby Kathryn Gray » Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:44 pm

I wrote this last year, after the wolverine was sighted at a photo station near Sagehen. It was thrilling to contemplate the fact wolverines could still survive around here, and even more thrilling when the same wolverine was sighted again this year (dna confirmation) not 15 miles from the original location of sighting. The developers contemplated in this are NOT Kirk Syme of Woodstock Development, and Todd Foster and Mark Foster of Foster Enterprises, collectively working as Royal Gorge LLC and various other llc's--just representational developers. And Kipple? A word invented by Philip K. Dick, but very descriptive of the clutter that multiplies on my desk.

DO DEVELOPERS DREAM OF ELECTRIC WOLVERINES?*

When the trees are gone
rocks scraped aside like so much kipple
what does the developer see as he surveys the landscape
of emotions does he show a ripple?

Looking out at earthmovers shoving dirt
shrubs and plants in one big crush
for the many deaths of birds, of animals
does the developer even blush?

At night when silence reigns
a brief lull in the onslaught of machines
does the developer in his bed
dream of electric wolverines?

And when the rain falls like tears
for those moments lost in time
when radiant life once garbed the mountains
does the developer know his crime?

* Philip K Dick's Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep forms the basis for this, and also, a scene from the film version, Blade Runner figures in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw6D_QfsmUY

Here's the link to info about this year's sighting of the same plucky gulo gulo http://yubanet.com/regional/Wolverine-S ... ruckee.php
Kathryn Gray
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:04 am

Re: FROM SAVE THE SUMMIT'S ARCHIVES

New postby Kathryn Gray » Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:44 pm

Here's something that appeared last year on CounterPunch, YubaNet, and California Progress Report. I'm including the link to California Progress Report, and, below it, a comment that really touched my heart. Wouldn't it be marvelous if Kirk Syme, of Woodstock Development, and Todd Foster, Mark Foster, and all of Foster Enterprises, and other investors in Royal Gorge LLC stepped back, looked at the treasure they have in Royal Gorge, and hunkered down with land trusts and other nonprofits to really save Royal Gorge Cross Country Ski Resort, instead of trying to convince the credulous that hundreds and hundreds of units won't destroy the serenity of Donner Summit, Serene Lakes, and Royal Gorge Cross Country Ski Resort?

http://www.californiaprogressreport.com ... ge_to.html

Here's the comment, from December 26, 2008--St Stephen's Day aka Boxing Day:

I felt sick reading this article. I used to spend every Christmas, for a week or two, at the Wilderness Lodge. Then, when it burned down, I was terribly saddened at the loss of my Christmas "home." Now it seems that Greed will once again triumph over Beauty.
Kathryn Gray
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:04 am


Return to General/overall comments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron